AI Pioneer Outcomes Explorer | ZEN AI Co.
ZEN AI Co.AI Pioneer Program
ZEN AI Co. × Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Washington

AI PioneerIn motion.

The Pioneer story, explored one modeled learner at a time. Move through 34,300 synthetic records across 2024–2026. Follow the path from a first idea to a live AI system.

Ages 11–18 Year 4 in 2027 Deployment-first curriculum Open Badges 3.0 on NEAR 2027 cohort sealed
Students ship toHugging FaceGitHubZEN Arsenal
MODELED

Every figure on this page comes from a synthetic dataset. The 34,300 student records were generated (NumPy PCG64, seed 20270101) for program design, evaluation planning and dashboard prototyping. No record is a real child, site or app, and none of these numbers are observed program results.

Shipped a live public URL MODELED
0
 
DRAG TO ORBIT · HOVER A STAR
Each point is one modeled student
MODELED DEPLOY FEEDLoading modeled records…
CHOOSE YOUR VIEW
A different lens on the same records

The outcome studio.

Trace the cohorts, reveal the learning lift, or inspect every stage. Your filters carry through.

MODELED DATA

Computed live from the students in view

What the data says

Six signals recalculated every time you change a filter. Each one links to the chart behind it.

Every student · nine measures · one strand each

Strand field

Each of the 34,300 students in view is one strand threading nine measures. The paths shared by more modeled learners glow brightest. Drag along an axis to brush a range, drag a title to reorder, click a title to flip, or untangle the field automatically.

Nine-measure strand field MODELED

Drag along an axis to brush a range; brushes combine across axes
Stage ladder · S0 → S7

Where students stop, and how far they climb

A deployment-first sequence makes the student's first artifact a live URL. Each bar is the share of students who reached at least that stage; colors follow the credential tier a stage earns.

Stage funnel MODELED

Share of students in view reaching each stage or higher

Days to first live deploy MODELED

Students who shipped a public URL, by days from enrollment
Build track → credential tier → hosting stack

How every student flows through the program

Ribbon width is the number of students. Ribbons take the color of the credential tier they carry, so the brightest streams are students who reached Tier 4 AI Pioneer.

Student flows MODELED

Students in view
Unsupervised learning · computed in your browser

Six student archetypes, found by machine

k-means++ clusters every student on ten standardized measures, and a principal component analysis projects them into three dimensions. No cluster is labeled by hand: each name comes from that cluster's two most distinctive measures. Select an archetype to filter the whole page to it.

Archetype space MODELED

Preparing features…
Waiting to cluster…
Measures: attendance, baseline score, score gain, stage reached, deploy speed (students who never deployed score as slowest), audience reach, mentor hours, home broadband, rural locale and age. Clusters summarize modeled records. They are not diagnoses or student types.
Rollout · 2024 → 2027

Cohort growth and curriculum maturity

Enrollment by cohort with the partner sites and jurisdictions active that year. Outcome rates rise as the curriculum, facilitators and managed hosting mature; that rise is a model assumption, not a finding.

Students enrolled by cohort MODELED

Other filters apply; the cohort filter highlights one year

Outcome rates by cohort MODELED

Deployment (S2+), public launch (S5+) and capstone (S7)
SEALED

The 2027 cohort is sealed

Its records are held in a private vault and have a planned release date of Tuesday, March 30, 2027. Every figure on this page covers 2024–2026 only.

--DAYS
--HRS
--MIN
--SEC
Geographic reach

Program skyline

Each state rises by the number of students in view and glows by the metric you pick. Tap a state to filter the whole page to it. Site IDs are coded and do not map to real clubs.

State skyline MODELED

Height: students · Color: students

State ranking MODELED

Top 12
Rates are shown only for states with 100 or more students in view.
Partner sites · space-filling layout

Site fingerprints

Every partner site is a six-petal glyph. Sites are laid along a generalized Hilbert curve, so sites with similar outcome profiles sit next to each other. Click a site to filter the whole page to it. Site codes are synthetic and do not map to real clubs.

Outcome fingerprint of every site MODELED

What students shipped

Apps, agents and where they run

Every app counted here resolved at a public URL. Hosting shares show the modeled shift toward ZEN Arsenal managed hosting across cohorts.

App categories MODELED

Deployed apps in view

Hosting stack share by cohort MODELED

Share of deployed apps; stack categories as defined in the dataset
Assessment · five constructs · 0–100

Learning outcomes, pre and post

Each ridge is the full score distribution for one construct, before and after the program. Within-subject pre/post with no comparison group, so gains are descriptive rather than causal.

Score distributions, pre vs post MODELED

Students in view · 2-point bins
PrePostTicks mark the means

Mean gain by highest stage reached MODELED

Points gained on the five-construct total

Distribution of score gain MODELED

Students in view, 5-point bins
Kernel density · rendered as terrain

Outcome topography

Where students land on two measures at once, shown as a landscape. Height is the density of students in view, contours mark equal density, and the surface morphs whenever a filter changes. Change mode shows how the landscape shifted from the first cohort to the latest.

Equity & access

Who ships, and what gets in the way

Outcome rates by student characteristic against the average for everyone in view. Home broadband is modeled as the largest structural constraint on a deployment-first program.

Groups under 30 students in view are marked low n. MODELED
Open Badges 3.0 · anchored on NEAR Protocol

Verifiable credentials

Tier follows the highest stage reached. Anchor status reflects on-chain confirmation of the issued badge.

Credential tiers MODELED

Students in view
Record-level explorer

Student explorer

Every row is a synthetic record. Search by ID, sort any column and open a record to see that student's modeled journey from enrollment to capstone.

SYNTHETIC RECORDS
The program

Built to put a live agent on the internet in week one

First in the country

ZEN AI Co. launched the AI Pioneer Program with the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Washington as the first youth AI literacy program in U.S. history. 2027 marks the fourth consecutive year of the partnership, with outreach expanding to YMCA chapters, Big Brothers Big Sisters and other youth-development partners.

Ship first, then learn against it

Students ages 11–18 build AI-powered, cloud-hosted agents and publish them on Hugging Face, GitHub and ZEN Arsenal, ZEN's own agentic builder platform. Prompting, data, auth, ethics and telemetry are taught against software real users can already reach.

Credentials that verify

Progress is recorded as Open Badges 3.0 credentials anchored on NEAR Protocol, from Tier 1 Deployer to Tier 4 AI Pioneer. A deployment-first program leaves machine-checkable evidence: a URL that resolves, an uptime number, a user count.

Read before citing

Method and limitations

Drawn from the dataset's own documentation. These figures must not be presented as observed program results in any grant application, federal proposal, press release or investor material.

Status of the data
Synthetic and modeled. Every student record was generated, not observed. The dataset exists to show what deployment-first AI literacy outcomes could look like at scale.
Population shown
34,300 students ages 11–18 across the 2024 (6,200), 2025 (11,300) and 2026 (16,800) cohorts. The 2027 cohort, and the 2026 cohort's retention into 2027, are sealed until March 30, 2027.
Latent readiness
Each record carries a readiness score built from attendance, delivery mode, home broadband and age band plus noise, mapped onto the stage ladder so cohort rates land on the model's targets.
Program maturity curve
Deployment rises cohort over cohort to reflect curriculum iteration, facilitator experience and a shift toward managed hosting. This is an assumption, not a finding.
Equity structure
Rural students and students without home broadband are modeled with lower attendance and slower time to first deploy. The broadband gap is left visible on purpose so it can be budgeted for.
No counterfactual
There is no control or comparison group. Standardized pre/post gains are upper-bound-flavored figures and are not causal evidence. A real evaluation needs a matched comparison group or a stepped-wedge design.
Selection into enrollment
Students who opt into an AI build program are not a random sample of club members. Withdrawal is modeled; selection at the front door is not.
App telemetry
Uptime is modeled high because managed hosting is reliable; weak projects show up as abandonment (not live at 90 days) rather than downtime. User counts are heavy-tailed.
Site coding
Site IDs follow a network-state-sequence code. They are not real clubs and must not be mapped to real locations.
Minor-subject data
A real version of this dataset is student data on minors. It requires guardian consent, a data governance policy, FERPA and COPPA review, and de-identification before any external sharing.
Loading modeled records…